distance to co-cluster

• 2022/09 Tran2022
  • page 21 : bounded twin-cover number does not imply bounded distance to co-cluster – Proposition 3.5. Twin Cover Number is incomparable to Distance to Co-Cluster.
  • page 21 : bounded distance to co-cluster does not imply bounded twin-cover number – Proposition 3.5. Twin Cover Number is incomparable to Distance to Co-Cluster.
  • page 28 : bounded modular-width does not imply bounded distance to co-cluster – Proposition 4.11. Modular-width is incomparable to Distance to Co-Cluster.
  • page 28 : bounded distance to co-cluster does not imply bounded modular-width – Proposition 4.11. Modular-width is incomparable to Distance to Co-Cluster.
• unknown
  • co-cluster upper bounds distance to co-cluster by a constant – by definition
• SchroderThesis
  • page 13 : bounded distance to cluster does not imply bounded distance to co-cluster – Proposition 3.3
  • page 14 : bounded distance to co-cluster does not imply bounded boxicity – Proposition 3.4
  • page 20 : bounded distance to co-cluster does not imply bounded distance to chordal – Proposition 3.12
  • page 20 : bounded distance to co-cluster does not imply bounded vertex connectivity – Proposition 3.12
  • page 20 : bounded distance to co-cluster does not imply bounded domatic number – Proposition 3.12